QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index QuakerInfo.com Forum
A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Q  Return to QuakerInfo. com home page

Peace Testimony and the Holocaust
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
orPowers



Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 637
Location: Medford, OR

PostPosted: Thu Mar 1, 2007 12:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gracie wrote:
Rather, I've inferred throughout reading these a refusal to waver from a set viewpoint. I see this not as a virtue of strength, but as a desire to not engage in true discussion.


When one is engaged in open minded debate, one SHOULD be willing to depart from a set viewpoint when compelling arguments are presented.

Have you modified your views during this discussion?

To date, I have seen only two people who would vastly prefer non-violent settlement of problems and issues acknowledge that there are times when it simply won't work. All I have seen Oneputt state is that simple fact; sometimes non-violence won't work and society is required to use force. The point then is that we must accept responsibility for our place in that society. When you hold an extreme view and will not allow any departure under ANY circumstances, you could say there is a "desire to not engage in true discussion."

In His Love,
orPowers
_________________
Romans 8:38-39

my blog: http://mild-side.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wsamuel
Site Admin


Joined: 28 Jul 2002
Posts: 699
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 1, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is one of the longer threads we've had, and it is degenerating, so I'm going to lock it.

We are going to probably have difficulty anytime someone comes in and very aggressively attacks a key tenet of Quakerism. It's questionable whether that's appropriate in this forum. We can raise questions about things, but to so aggressively attack something so basic to the faith is not really the purpose of this Forum.
_________________
Bill Samuel, Webservant, QuakerInfo.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Page 6 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group