QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index QuakerInfo.com Forum
A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Q  Return to QuakerInfo. com home page

Death Penalty
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pulpculture



Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 564
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:36 pm    Post subject: Death Penalty Reply with quote

I have just come across these statistics (they probably common knowledge to those in the USA but news to me in the UK)

US Methods Of Execution

Lethal injection: Authorised in 37 states (plus US military & federal government)
Electrocution: In 10 states (sole method in Nebraska)
Gas chamber: In five states (all of which have lethal injection as alternative)
Hanging: Only in New Hampshire and Washington
Firing squad: In Idaho and Oklahoma. It is available to inmates in Utah who chose it before the method was banned

I was shocked that a country, such as the USA, still puts a rope round someones neck and hangs them to kill them. If I'm honest the last 4 are totally barbaric.
_________________
.


I said don't forget Burma!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barbara_q



Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Phila., PA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:53 am    Post subject: instruments of the empire Reply with quote

...
_________________
http://www.pax-et-lux.blogspot.com/

"Together, let us reject the clamour of fear and listen to the whisperings of hope."
Statement on Peace, Aotearoa (New Zealand) Yearly Meeting


Last edited by barbara_q on Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:56 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
barbara_q



Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 69
Location: Phila., PA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:53 am    Post subject: instruments of the empire Reply with quote

Quote:
If I'm honest the last 4 are totally barbaric.

...and there have been serious questions raised about lethal injection as well. Two different injections are administered to the prisoner, one that's supposed to erase the pain and another that results in death. But there's been a question as to whether the first injection has actually worked in some cases, as there seems to be evidence that prisoners were left physically paralyzed but feeling excruciating pain. If you're up to reading other horror stories, you can find them at

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?scid=8&did=478


Barbaric? That's putting it mildly...But, unfortunately, America has turned into a country that tortures also...an empire where excuses can be found for writing barbarity into the laws and policies. A few of us who attended the QUIT conference have started a local group to heighten awareness of the problem of torture in our region.

Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God as the alternative to empire.
_________________
http://www.pax-et-lux.blogspot.com/

"Together, let us reject the clamour of fear and listen to the whisperings of hope."
Statement on Peace, Aotearoa (New Zealand) Yearly Meeting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
punkrainbow



Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 301
Location: Leeds

PostPosted: Sat Mar 1, 2008 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God as the alternative to empire.


I'd like to echo your sentiment Barbara. Jesus' 'Kingdom of God' is nothing less than an alternative way of life, one in which all the old power relationships, loyalties and institutions are turned on their head by the pervasive love of God. Jesus said it would be a 'Kingdom not this world, established, not by fear, brutality or force, but by love: a principality where the powerful would submit to the powerless; where weakness would triumph over strength, where the 'meek will inherit the earth'. The killing of criminals against the state is the epitome of the 'old ways of doing things', where the love of God is shut out.

This is how Jesus himself died of course, as a criminal under sentence of death. But even when he was dying at the hands of brutal executioners, he didn't desire vengeance, (the most common emotional fuel for the death penalty and war). Instead he said, 'Father, forgive them, because they know not what they do'. To me there is a powerful hint here. The desire for vengeance is like a mania , it sweeps through whole populations until people can't think straight. Society become consumed by it until blood gives birth to blood and murder gives birth to murder. In the end the value of all life is cheapened in the process and the demand for justice triumphs over mercy. In his refusal to desire vengeance Jesus shows us two things. Firstly that some brave soul can always break the cycle of hate and the degradation of life by refusing to give into blood-lust. Secondly Jesus shows that we need both justice and mercy in order to live a moral life.

Justice without mercy becomes spiteful and vengeful. It forgets the frailty of all human beings and seeks the application of unflinching moral principles, whatever the cost. Sometimes the thirst for justice can be perverted into a kind mob-vindictiveness, in which case, it is no-longer justice. It just comes a desire for hate, a thirst for pain or violence.

Mercy without justice is ineffective, wishy-washy and negligent. It lacks courage to confront moral failure, it would rather believe 'the best' of someone and leave the offender to it. Compassion when misplaced can become a disease of moral inaction, which attempts to restore the offender at the expense of others suffering. We need both justice and mercy in order to exercise our moral choices with discernment. If we combine justice and mercy we must surely come to the conclusion that society has the right to punishment, but it has no right to vengeance. To my mind the death-penalty is rooted in vengeance and hate. We should be better than the murder and not stoop to his or her level.
_________________
I saw the infinite love of God. I saw also that there was an ocean of darkness and death; but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Anthony



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Sat Mar 1, 2008 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

When George Bush became the US President I experienced a chill down my spine - why? At that time I had befriended a man on death row in Texas and was in receipt of newsletters that informed me of what was happening in the various states regarding execution. Therefore, I was well informed about the 'Texecution Governor.'

Is a governor's attitude towards the death penalty an indicator of a presidential candidate's enthusiasm for war?


Last edited by Anthony on Mon Mar 3, 2008 5:41 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dan



Joined: 03 Dec 2003
Posts: 273
Location: midwest

PostPosted: Mon Mar 3, 2008 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is interesting to me that so many in the 'prolife" camp would also vehemently support capital punishment.

I wonder how much sense this makes? Is it not inconsistent?

If we are pro life on one end, then we surely need to be on the other. I know the law "beareth not the sword in vain" as the Bible says but surely killing a person for his/her crimes is not right. Since God is the giver of life, then only He whould be allowed to take it.

This would send a more consistent message to the prodeath crowd. Which seems to believe that killing the preborn is OK but the death penalty is wrong. Oh my!

Killing the person for their crime is to remove them from this world and take away any oportunity they may have to repent of their sins and come to the light. I do not really see how Christian people could justify such a thing.

Thy friend,
Dan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
punkrainbow



Joined: 24 Dec 2007
Posts: 301
Location: Leeds

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Is a governor's attitude towards the death penalty an indicator of a presidential candidate's enthusiasm for war?


While I like a bit of 'Bush-bashing' like the next person, I suspect that you may have committed the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc, 'Since that event followed this one, that event must have been caused by this one'. Maybe it's just coincidence that the Texan governor's predilection for the electric chair has led to a pre-emptive strike on an oil rich Arab state, with disastrous consequences.
_________________
I saw the infinite love of God. I saw also that there was an ocean of darkness and death; but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
kevin roberts



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 768
Location: more or less anywhere in america

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 2:32 pm    Post subject: Re: Death Penalty Reply with quote

Pulpculture wrote:
I have just come across these statistics (they probably common knowledge to those in the USA but news to me in the UK)

US Methods Of Execution

Lethal injection: Authorised in 37 states (plus US military & federal government)
Electrocution: In 10 states (sole method in Nebraska)
Gas chamber: In five states (all of which have lethal injection as alternative)
Hanging: Only in New Hampshire and Washington
Firing squad: In Idaho and Oklahoma. It is available to inmates in Utah who chose it before the method was banned

I was shocked that a country, such as the USA, still puts a rope round someones neck and hangs them to kill them. If I'm honest the last 4 are totally barbaric.


I seem to recall that Oklahoma was one of the very first US states to authorize lethal injection as a form of execution. Matthew, I would prefer the required form of execution to be quick and painless, but as gory and horrifying as possible. Something along the lines of the old British India practice of tying criminals in front of cannons, then blowing them to bits.

The reason for this is that "easy" and "kind" forms of execution leave the victim just as dead as any other method, but encourage the killers to continue because they are "painless," or "humane." There is no humane way to kill a human being. Lethal injection is designed to make it easy on the killers, not the killed.

Forcing everybody to recognize the barbarism of execution by any method might be more successful at stopping it than agitating for humane methods. But maybe not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Anthony



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

punkrainbow wrote:
Quote:
Is a governor's attitude towards the death penalty an indicator of a presidential candidate's enthusiasm for war?


While I like a bit of 'Bush-bashing' like the next person, I suspect that you may have committed the logical fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc, 'Since that event followed this one, that event must have been caused by this one'. Maybe it's just coincidence that the Texan governor's predilection for the electric chair has led to a pre-emptive strike on an oil rich Arab state, with disastrous consequences.


Friend, you may well be right - I'll leave it for others to decided. Someone who signed more death warrants than any other governor within a given period that he warranted the name 'Texecution Governor' - is surely cause for concern. The signs were there - fallacy or no fallacy. Shocked There's a named condition for such people and they should not be given power, particularly as the most powerful person in the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BillSamuel



Joined: 06 Aug 2002
Posts: 772
Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 9:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The readiness to execute indicates a belief that killing can be an appropriate way to deal with problems, so logically it would be an indicator. I do think a governor eager to use the death penalty would tend to be more prone to be warlike. But also people are often not logical and consistent, so it's not going to be a perfect correlation.

I would note that Senators McCain, Clinton and Obama are all supporters of the death penalty - and in Obama's case he supports it even though he states it is ineffective. All three also support increasing the military budget. So there seems to be some consistency there.
_________________
Bill Samuel, Silver Spring, MD, USA
Co-Coordinator, Friends in Christ
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I sometimes think that the death penalty is cleary deserved by those individuals who have committed premediated, henious murder without remorse. The problem is that the legal system is not a fair playing field economically and racially, and those of us who desire fair and equal justice for everyone find the process a complete failure. The sheer expense alone, in some death penalty trials, argues for a reduced penalty of life in prison without the possiblility of parole. Captial crimes procesution in many states carry a such a high cost to the judicial system, that the death penalty will someday be eliminated merely due to its cost. A victory against the death penalty obtained not my moral imperitive, but by economics. In many cases, one reads where a defense attorney appointed to a capital crimes defendant has no experience whatsoever in a death pentalty case; of prosecutors who willfully exclude evidence helpful to the defense; and of witnesses who are paid informants for the state. As gruesome and as vile are the murders who commit the crime, the system used to prosecute them is no less evil.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Keith Maddison



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 238
Location: North England

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Recently on British TV an ex-Conservative Home Secretary (that is the man in charge of Law & Order) Michel Portilo did an investigation into the death penalty in the USA, to see which was the most painless. It was all a bit gruesome, but in his findings he found all the methods used involved pain to the prisoner. He found one method that was not only pain free but actually put the prisoner in a state of euphoria. This method was withdrawing oxygen, he proved it having oxygen withdrawn form himself, until moments before death when he was given oxygen and recovered. When he presented his findings to US politicians, (I do not know who they were) they said that would be no good as we want these people to suffer. For me that said it all, the death penalty is about vengeance, apart from that we know it serves no other purpose. By the way Portilo is not pro-death penalty.
_________________
Don't follow leaders and watch the parking meters, the pumps don't work because the vandals took the handles.
Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Shay



Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 885

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.michaelportillo.co.uk/articles/art_nipress/death_penalty.htm

Quote:
My findings did not satisfy those opposed to the death penalty. They do not want execution to be sanitised further. Some who support capital punishment were horrified to contemplate that sadistic murderers would die in a euphoric state. That might be painless, they said, but not humane to the families of the killer’s victims.


Here's part one of five:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do9VLZCHlN0&feature=related

I haven't time to watch this right now... but is this what you saw:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9YgWXKAwNY

I'm afraid I don't have time to watch the whole thing, but there's an 'expert in government's policy in the subject" who is actually a pro-death-penalty activist, to put it mildly:
http://www.nyls.edu/pages/347.asp
He's the one quoted as saying it should hurt and be scary and all that, not an American politician.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Keith Maddison



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 238
Location: North England

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you for that Shay, I was a few months ago when it was TV. I did not realize it was on the net. I just remembered the TV program reading the forum, and thought friends may be interested.
_________________
Don't follow leaders and watch the parking meters, the pumps don't work because the vandals took the handles.
Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Shay



Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Posts: 885

PostPosted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Keith Maddison wrote:
Thank you for that Shay, I was a few months ago when it was TV. I did not realize it was on the net. I just remembered the TV program reading the forum, and thought friends may be interested.


No problem, I'd have watched the whole thing myself, but my son is playing with his dinosaurs behind me and whenever a movie comes on the computer he wants to watch it. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group