 |
QuakerInfo.com Forum A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Stuart Hartley Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 2:34 pm Post subject: Liberal Quaker Thought |
|
|
I have introduced this new topic for use by liberal Quakers so that we may have a forum in which to discuss our insights without having to be concerned about the sensitivities of those who are Christ-Centred Quakers and who appear not to consider us to be real Quakers.
However, if you are not a Liberal Quaker and yet still wish to discuss this topic, please feel free to do so but from the Liberal Quaker perspective only. I hope that this is acceptabel. Lets see what happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Themis

Joined: 04 Oct 2002 Posts: 412 Location: P.O. Box 21121, GR. 11410, Athens, Greece
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 2:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why create a new Forum? Beliefnet is Liberal and the majority of the Quaker groups on Yahoo are also. By the way this is thy right and I won't upset thy conversations here. This will be my only post on this thread I just thought thee might like to learn that there are many groups for liberal Friends on the net. Quaker (Yahoo! Groups), Quakerism (Yahoo! Groups), etc. Beliefnet (dominated by Liberal Friends).
Have a nice discussion!
Themis _________________ Christ is our Lord, Saviour, and Friend. He is EVERYTHING! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
servant
Joined: 20 Nov 2002 Posts: 256 Location: Waunakee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I'm liberal and Christ-centered. Can I still participate?  _________________ abdul muhib
Life *is* the parable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stuart Hartley Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| servant wrote: |
Well, I'm liberal and Christ-centered. Can I still participate?  |
Why not Servant if you agree minimise the use of Christ-cantered language and I will agree to whatever you stipulate.
With love Stuart  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stuart Hartley Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you spot the deliberate error "Christ-cantered"?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wsamuel Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2002 Posts: 695 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is not a place for discussions that are limited to a certain variety of Quaker, or that must be carried on within the framework of a particular wing of Quakerism. This is a place for dialogue open to all varieties of Quakers, and those interested in Quakerism.
While I know of no forum specifically restricted to liberal Quakers, there are several forums where most of those posting are liberal Quakers. There are forums specifically for evangelical Quakers. _________________ Bill Samuel, Webservant, QuakerInfo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
servant
Joined: 20 Nov 2002 Posts: 256 Location: Waunakee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wsamuel wrote: |
| , there are several forums where most of those posting are liberal Quakers. |
As I would say is the case here, imo. _________________ abdul muhib
Life *is* the parable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wsamuel Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2002 Posts: 695 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, Friend, I wonder if you are using the term somewhat differently than others are. I think most have been using it in the sense of a non-orthodox (either in the Quaker context or the more general Christian one) view of Jesus. I don't think this forum has been heavily weighted towards one side or the other in that context. If you are using "liberal" in the political sense, that's a different story. But that's not what I intended.
I am suspecting this because you referred to yourself as a liberal Quaker, yet the views you have expressed about Christ are not those normally associated with liberal Quakerism. _________________ Bill Samuel, Webservant, QuakerInfo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
servant
Joined: 20 Nov 2002 Posts: 256 Location: Waunakee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wsamuel wrote: |
Well, Friend, I wonder if you are using the term somewhat differently than others are. I think most have been using it in the sense of a non-orthodox (either in the Quaker context or the more general Christian one) view of Jesus. I don't think this forum has been heavily weighted towards one side or the other in that context. If you are using "liberal" in the political sense, that's a different story. But that's not what I intended.
I am suspecting this because you referred to yourself as a liberal Quaker, yet the views you have expressed about Christ are not those normally associated with liberal Quakerism. |
Well, yes, exactly! I've posted as much before. It does everyone a disservice (not that I'm directing this at you or anyone; speaking generally) when we use the word "liberal" to refer to those that are not Christ-centered. We as a church tend towards the liberal side of things- politically as well as theologically- in comparison to most other churches- that are still Christian. That's why I felt lead to come here and be part of this (Quakers I mean)- finally a liberal, Christ-centered church. I think when we use the word liberal to mean those who are no longer Christian, we do disservice to the word liberal itself- a word at the heart meaning one who is generous and giving, and by application, one who is open and caring for the poor and against violence, et.al. _________________ abdul muhib
Life *is* the parable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John

Joined: 05 Nov 2002 Posts: 481 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We must make a distiction between political liberalism and theological liberalism.
We are all aware of the differences between liberal and conservative politics. But we are not all (apparently) in agreement on what being theologically liberal or conservative means as it applies to Quakers.
Some examples:
Liberal Quaker - non-Christ centered, unprogrammed, generally politically liberal, theologically liberal.
Evangelical Quaker - Christ centered, programmed, generally politically mixed, running from liberal to conservative, theologically conservative.
Conservative Quaker - Christ centered, unprogrammed, politically liberal on some issues (i.e. peace and non-violence), and politically conservative on others (limited government), theologically very conservative.
We'll have big problems if we don't keep track of whether we are talking about political and theological issues when we use the L and C labels. _________________ John Price |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
servant
Joined: 20 Nov 2002 Posts: 256 Location: Waunakee, Wisconsin
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 5:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
And I'd add:
Christ-centered Quaker - programmed, generally politically liberal (not having to be though), and theologically liberal generally (but not having to be).
I find most of those in our Yearly Meeting that I meet do not hold to a literal interpretation of the Bible on all points, do not hold it as *the* thing that rules our lives (as opposed to the Spirit), do not express in words or thought hatred towards gays and those committing abortion, do not believe the Bible is inerrant, care about the poor, care about peace issues. All of these are theologically liberal concerns. Just because the extreme left wing theologically of the Christian church has so distorted the message that it ceases to be Christian doesn't mean they get to steal a very healthy term as well! We are not like the extreme Episcopalians, but we are much further from the Southern Baptists in thought. Again, not all of us, and that is just fine (indeed, quite wonderful)- but a majority of us in our meeting. _________________ abdul muhib
Life *is* the parable. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stuart Hartley Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| wsamuel wrote: |
This is a place for dialogue open to all varieties of Quakers, and those interested in Quakerism.
|
How we tie ourselves in knots with words when words are inadequate to describe our spiritual insights and I wonder how essential words are to our "salvation".
I agree with Bill on the ideal for this forum but I note that the main bulk of its content appear to be from Christ-cantered Quakers (CCQ) and if someone such as I write in neutral language (descriptive not content) then the majority response seems to be from the CCQ writing in a Christ-cantered language that drove me away from orthodox and traditional Christianity in the first place.
I suspect that there are liberal Quakers reading the content of these pages but I am unsure why they do not make more of a contribution: maybe they prefer not to have to defend themselves from claims of apostasy. Perhaps they could let us know.
One should be able to have a honest and challenging conversation with all Quakers without being labelled "true Quakers" and false Quakers! (see why it is so difficult for liberals to have a decent conversation with CCQ.)
However, perhaps there are no vocal liberal Quakers registered with this forum and I am in the wilderness, on my own and perhaps I should go to one of the liberal forums after all. I would miss you all, even sister Brenda.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wsamuel Site Admin

Joined: 28 Jul 2002 Posts: 695 Location: Silver Spring, MD, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, not everything posted clearly identifies people by where they are on the Quaker spectrum. Some people who have posted here I know are quite liberal Quakers because I know them from other forums, but it may not have been evident from what they have felt to post here.
I think it is true that Quakers in general are liberal theologically compared to fundamentalist Christians, for example, but there is a usage which is internal to Quakerism. Things like "liberal" are relative, and so in the Quaker context many of us refer to it to mean on the relatively liberal (theologically) side of the Quaker spectrum. That's quite a different context than relative to the Christian community as a whole.
I noticed when I visited yearly meeting sessions of Evangelical Friends Church-Eastern Region, a body generally considered to be about as far from the liberal end of the Quaker spectrum as any yearly meeting, that Friends would talk about having come to Friends because they weren't comfortable with the rigidities in the churches from which they came. What they would say was not much different from what I hear people in liberal yearly meetings say were the reasons they left other churches. So the point about Friends in general being "liberal" in some respects compared to the larger church is well taken. _________________ Bill Samuel, Webservant, QuakerInfo.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
eLUCID8
Joined: 15 Apr 2003 Posts: 13 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2003 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dear Stuart
Be of good cheer. I sense from your posts I have read so far that I share a fair amount of your liberal theological trends
Jeff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank
Joined: 27 Jan 2003 Posts: 95 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2003 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stuart,
Please don't be alarmed, but you may be a Christ-centered Quaker who merely doesn't realize it yet. God does move in mysterious ways.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|