 |
QuakerInfo.com Forum A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
pilgrim
Joined: 01 Dec 2008 Posts: 64 Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
John,
Perhaps God has allowed for people to eat meat at different times throughout history. However, in the Kingdom of God all creation will live in peace. And as Christians we are called to live in that Kingdom now to the best of our abilities.
Also, I don't see any reason to believe that Jesus did not support the Jewish dietary laws as laid out in the Torah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jnsn wrote: |
| Simply because you are missing a good meal.- John |
Not funny - so, now we joke about killing animals, this reveals a lot.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthony wrote: |
| jnsn wrote: |
| Simply because you are missing a good meal.- John |
Not funny - so, now we joke about killing animals, this reveals a lot.  |
Er, no. It was a joke about an animal that was already killed, not killing animals. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shay wrote: |
| Anthony wrote: |
| jnsn wrote: |
| Simply because you are missing a good meal.- John |
Not funny - so, now we joke about killing animals, this reveals a lot.  |
Er, no. It was a joke about an animal that was already killed, not killing animals. |
Thank you Shay but although this may be true the joke is still a joke about the death of animals, even though Kevin would not have killed them for sport but for what he saw as necessity. John simply took the opportunity for a laugh - I doubt if Kevin though it funny Did you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthony wrote: |
| Shay wrote: |
| Anthony wrote: |
| jnsn wrote: |
| Simply because you are missing a good meal.- John |
Not funny - so, now we joke about killing animals, this reveals a lot.  |
Er, no. It was a joke about an animal that was already killed, not killing animals. |
Thank you Shay but although this may be true the joke is still a joke about the death of animals, even though Kevin would not have killed them for sport but for what he saw as necessity. John simply took the opportunity for a laugh - I doubt if Kevin though it funny Did you? |
Not really, but I've already said I wouldn't eat a raccoon if you paid me. Like, a lot. And that would have to include free health care.
Personally I'm pretty sick of "Hurr hurr, People Eating Tasty Animals, amirite?" and "There's a place for all god's creatures- next to my mashed potatos har har," but more because they're old and overused than because they're not humorous to begin with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jnsn
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Shay wrote: |
| Anthony wrote: |
| Shay wrote: |
| Anthony wrote: |
| jnsn wrote: |
| Simply because you are missing a good meal.- John |
Not funny - so, now we joke about killing animals, this reveals a lot.  |
Er, no. It was a joke about an animal that was already killed, not killing animals. |
Thank you Shay but although this may be true the joke is still a joke about the death of animals, even though Kevin would not have killed them for sport but for what he saw as necessity. John simply took the opportunity for a laugh - I doubt if Kevin though it funny Did you? |
Not really, but I've already said I wouldn't eat a raccoon if you paid me. Like, a lot. And that would have to include free health care.
Personally I'm pretty sick of "Hurr hurr, People Eating Tasty Animals, amirite?" and "There's a place for all god's creatures- next to my mashed potatos har har," but more because they're old and overused than because they're not humorous to begin with. |
Wow, what a hall of mirrors.
What is the record for imbedded quotes
And I didn't even think it was a joke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kevin roberts

Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 768 Location: more or less anywhere in america
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i haven't eaten animals in so long that the stuff doesn't register with me as food anymore, and i've lost all taste for it. i once heated up a can of what i thought was vegetable soup in my truck (it was dark). when i opened up the can there was all this yellow grease floating on the top. i looked at the label and realized that it had been made with chicken broth. now, to a meat eater, chicken broth makes soup taste good. but all i could think of as i looked into that can was "somebody boiled a dead bird in my food." i ate it out of necessity, but to my taste buds it was pretty gross.
i've killed so many things in my life that it saddens me. mostly unnecessary death, as well. hundreds and thousands of things, what with random violence, pest control, and butchering. also academic zoology, with its emphasis on taking animals apart to see how they work. i don't do it anymore. the only animals i kill now are the rabid ones and the mice that crap all over my dishes in the kitchen drawers.
i live in a hunting part of the world, and i let one of my neighbors harvest the deer off my property every fall. he's a good archer, and it keeps the deer from becoming even more of a problem than they already are. in my area, deer have multiplied many-fold from their pre-european colonization numbers, and can become a serious agricultural pest and road hazard.
i've left off the raccoons until i have bees again, as there's no enmity between them and me and i would never kill one if they would leave me alone. i've killed my last skunk, as well
for bears, however, i would happily sacrifice the front of my car to encourage them to move on. luckily for my auto bill, they're not common. shay, there's actually lots more of those where you live, i believe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jnsn
Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pilgrim- I also think that there is every reason to think that Jesus followed the dietary laws as detailed in the Torah. But that is because he was a Jew. I am a "gentile" and I am guessing you are too.
There was something around 800 years between Isaiah and Acts according to my handy bible time-line. And 2010 years to get here. One point that might be made is that the Jews do not seem to feel that Isaiah is the trump.
On another note- did you get a lot of snow in this latest go-round?-John |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kevin roberts wrote: |
| for bears, however, i would happily sacrifice the front of my car to encourage them to move on. luckily for my auto bill, they're not common. shay, there's actually lots more of those where you live, i believe |
There's too few. We have mucked up the ecosystem for bears, and that's about 13 letters off from the first letter I want to use.
I saw a bear cub once when I was at an overnight camp in the Poconos, and I've seen bear claw marks in the same area, but they need more space than the sprawl of vacation houses and ski resorts have claimed to be a really healthy population. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jnsn wrote: |
Wow, what a hall of mirrors.
What is the record for imbedded quotes
And I didn't even think it was a joke |
Not everyone bothers erasing everything when replying to the latest comment on a topic, and in answer to your question, I've seen 50+ embedded replies in a forum, though admittedly it was a bit of a goof once it got past ten.
I sincerely doubt it's a record. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| jnsn wrote: |
| Pilgrim- I also think that there is every reason to think that Jesus followed the dietary laws as detailed in the Torah. But that is because he was a Jew. I am a "gentile" and I am guessing you are too. |
Perhaps Jesus was challenging the norm? We don't know - however we know he was upsetting 'his own' (i.e. Jews). What's to say that's what he was speaking up against the [animal] carnage going on in the Temple? What's to say the religious elite that had control over food at the time upset him? _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pulpculture wrote: |
| jnsn wrote: |
| Pilgrim- I also think that there is every reason to think that Jesus followed the dietary laws as detailed in the Torah. But that is because he was a Jew. I am a "gentile" and I am guessing you are too. |
Perhaps Jesus was challenging the norm? We don't know - however we know he was upsetting 'his own' (i.e. Jews). What's to say that's what he was speaking up against the [animal] carnage going on in the Temple? What's to say the religious elite that had control over food at the time upset him? |
Is there a record of Jesus eating meat? If Jesus was who we claim he is then he would not have worshipped at the Temple. The Temple was a massive butchers shop where millions of animals were slaughtered during the Passover. It was a place of death and destruction and reeked of blood and distressed animals. A more horrendous place would be hard to tell. Not only that but the whole priestly system was corrupt.
I believe that Jesus was one those who was very much against the cult of temple worship and would have agreed with the Essenes and latter prophets that that such a place was against the law of God. I understand that Jesus' temper tantrum in the Temple was staged to attract maximum attention to his message that all sacrifice were to stop. Jesus crucifixion was to be seen as the last sacrifice and the end of temple worship. Lets not forget that Jesus message was for the Jews and his message was that God did not approve of the cult of sacrifice as he required love sacrifice.
Add whole-offerings to sacrifices and eat flesh if will. But when I brought your forefathers out of Egypt, I gave no commands about whole-offering and sacrifice; I said not one word about them. (Jeramiah 7:21-22)
Loyalty is my desire, not sacrifice; not whole offerings but knowledge of God. (Hosea 6:6) Also cited twice by Jesus at Matthew 9:13 and 12:7)
Your countless sacrifices, what are they to me? says the Lord. I am sated with whole offering of rams and the fat of buffaloes; I have no desire for the blood of bulls, of sheep and of goat. Whenever you come to enter my presence - who asked you to this? No more you trample my courts [not necessarily the Temple courts. The offer you your gifts is useless, the reek of sacrifice is abhorrent to me....there is blood on you hands; Wash yourselves and be clean...(Isaiah 1:11-13, 15-16)
He who slaughtered an ox is like him who kills a man.(Isaiah 66:3)
I desire mercy not sacrifice (Matt: 9-13) also http://bible.cc/hosea/6-6.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wheatpenny
Joined: 17 Apr 2010 Posts: 41 Location: York, PA, USA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthony wrote: |
Is there a record of Jesus eating meat? ] |
Jesus in all likelihood ate meat at the Last Supper. It was a Passover dinner which included lamb. _________________ "Hurrah for Quakerism!" (Caroline Fox) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kiahanie

Joined: 25 Mar 2008 Posts: 464 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jesus is recorded as having eaten fish, and fed fish to a few thousand people. He also told his followers to prepare lamb for a Passover meal.
Concerning cleansing the Temple, Jesus had 3 major problems with the 2nd Temple rituals and organization.
There was the "den of thieves" aspect: money changing and the selling of sacrificial animals was a source of profit for the Priests, which burden fell most heavily upon the poorest.
There was also the difference between Second Temple ritual, and the interposition of priests between God and worshipers. The Pharisaic movement (the pre-cursor to the post-Temple rabbinical organization of Jewish worship) emphasized the personal connection with the Divine, living right before God and man. Jesus was almost certainly a part of that movement. Ritual sacrifice (and the selling of those sacrifices) did not lead to right relationships between people or their God. The Temple had become a "marketplace" rather than a house of worship.
Finally there was the political part: The Temple Priests and their their "class", the Sadducees, were broadly seen as collaborators with the Romans. The institution of the Temple was effectively a means for the Romans to exert another level of control over the Jewish population. The priests obliged in order to stay in business.
The Gospels record the first two aspects. (The third would have been politically infeasible for a movement that was trying to gain traction in the post-Temple Roman Empire.) Jesus is not recorded as acting out of concern for the animals, but rather out of a concern that Temple practices were violating the relationship between worshipers and the divine.
Nevertheless, he did return to the Temple to teach at least once. _________________ "There is a field out beyond right and wrong. I'll meet you there." --Jellaludin Rumi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2010 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| orthodox_quaker wrote: |
| Anthony wrote: |
Is there a record of Jesus eating meat? ] |
Jesus in all likelihood ate meat at the Last Supper. It was a Passover dinner which included lamb. |
There is some debate whether it was the Passover feast that is recorded in the Gospels |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|