QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index QuakerInfo.com Forum
A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Q  Return to QuakerInfo. com home page

Israel and it's control of the UK media
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That was a very good post, Kiahanie. My leadings are if we speak truth to justice and bear witness to the innocent, I would still lay fault on the tragedy known as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict on 19th century Zionism, the perverted political and religious facism that it fostered, and on the need it created to displace Palestinain Arabs to fullfill its plan of salvation for persecuted European Jewery. Quakers were once persecuted, burned at the stake, imprisoned, exiled, and still founded a faith and peace tradition which strove to cause no suffering or imposition on others. When one robs Peter to pay Paul, as the Catholics would say, one must still acknowledge that the robbery occured, and not quibble over the merits of Peter, or of Paul. The crime has been committed, the robbery seen, and perhaps it is only for us to leave our witness, and enable history to be the final judge.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Anthony



Joined: 30 Jun 2004
Posts: 1542

PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Smile

Do you guys just happen to carry all of these fact around in your heads or do you spend time researching them before you post?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kiahanie



Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 464
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anthony wrote:
Hi Smile

Do you guys just happen to carry all of these fact around in your heads or do you spend time researching them before you post?

Some of both.

The Israel-Palestine issue has been a concern of mine since the '67 war. I have been active in different ways at different levels and intensity fairly constantly during that time, so I have been usually reasonably current on developments and vicissitudes. Frequent use through interactions in the community and with conflict participants refreshes my memory and allows others to correct its deficits, so it often serves me adequately, but sometimes I do need to clear away some foggy areas by actually checking -if I am not sure of a fact, I check it. And sometimes a situation is so fluid that a current answer needs to be checked because the facts may have changed since last time I spoke/wrote on the topic. (Example: What are the percentages of [Israelis][Palestinians] who support a two-state solution? one-state solution? trading land for peace?)

I have worked with many people on both sides of the issue, including Israelis and Palestinians who once fought each other. These continuing discussions provide both good factual input and good checks for my facts (one or the other -sometimes both- is sure to correct me when I am wrong), and also help to balance my perspective, which has changed over the past 40 years. Once in a while a discussion will arise in an area where I have little background and will need to do serious research.

ADDENDUM:
Israel-Palestine has never been my primary area of activity. I-P has been part of my larger concerns regarding US foreign policy. Consequently I tend to see I-P issues in terms of how US policy has impacted those issues from regional and global perspectives. I am more concerned with US policy than with Israeli or Palestinian policy, since US policy is what I can directly affect, and what has so adversely affected the Middle East for so many decades.
_________________
"There is a field out beyond right and wrong. I'll meet you there." --Jellaludin Rumi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I took a elective college course in International Studies- Middle Eastern Politics, and have followed the plight of the Palestinian Arabs since having a Arab room mate in college ( he was from Saudi Arabia, completing his M.A. in Literature on William Faulkner, of all things, and also introduced me to Mulsim Literature and the Holy Quran ). My own interest in that region took on new life when the American Hostages were seized in Tehran by the Revolutionary Guards, and it behooved me to figure out why so many countries the Arab world held the United States in disdain and contempt. My interest in the history of Zionism came from readings about the Allied occupation of the Ottoman Empire after the end of WWI, and what political forces influenced United Nations actions there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pulpculture



Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 564
Location: England

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Israeli soldiers shot flotilla activists from choppers

The Association of Human Rights and Solidarity for Oppressed Peoples (MAZLUM-DER) stated during a press conference on Monday that Israeli commandos shot at activists on the Mavi Marmara from their helicopters, according to autopsy reports.
Yasin Dıvrak, a lawyer for MAZLUM-DER, said the autopsy reports prepared by the Council of Forensic Medicine (ATK) proved that Israeli soldiers, contrary to their claims of self-defense, aimed to kill and started to shoot even before descending onto the Mavi Marmara, which was carrying humanitarian aid to the under-siege Gaza on May 31.
During the Israeli raid, nine peace activists were killed and dozens more injured. Israel claims that its soldiers attacked passengers in self-defense because some of the passengers assaulted Israeli soldiers with sticks and knives after they descended onto the ship. The autopsy reports also showed that the corpses of the activists were washed before being sent to Turkey and some alcohol had been found in their bodies.
The press conference was held by MAZLUM-DER İstanbul branch Chairman Cihat Gökdemir, lawyers Dıvrak and Selçuk Kar and the deputy chairman of the association, Gülden Solmaz. Dıvrak said: “All the deaths occurred due to injuries caused by firearms. The ATK reports show that the bodies have been washed, so it was not possible to find any traces of chemicals or gun powder. We wonder why Israel washed the bodies of those who were killed.”
Dıvrak added that since the bodies had been washed and all the clothes were extremely dirty it was not possible to determine the shooting range.
“Most of the bullets did not stay in the bodies but entered and exited the bodies. Some bullets exited the skull but entered [the body] again,” he stated.
Dıvrak underlined that a very unusual bullet was found in the brain of activist İbrahim Bilgen. He said this bullet surprised doctors because they have never seen this kind of bullet before. “Israel claims that the soldiers were attacked and that they were defending themselves. But the autopsy reports show that this is not true. Most of the bullets came from above and entered the skulls. It is obvious that the bullets came from the choppers,” he said.

Source
_________________
.


I said don't forget Burma!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kevin roberts



Joined: 12 Sep 2007
Posts: 768
Location: more or less anywhere in america

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pulpculture wrote:
. . .
. . . “Israel claims that the soldiers were attacked and that they were defending themselves. But the autopsy reports show that this is not true. Most of the bullets came from above and entered the skulls. It is obvious that the bullets came from the choppers,” he said.

Source


interesting, sad, and conclusive. that sort of forensics often supplies useful insight into a situation long over.

at the battle of the little big horn in dakota territory, some 200 american cavalry men commanded by a psycho named george armstrong custer were massacred after they attacked what turned out to be about 3000 armed sioux indians. only indian accounts of the battle have been available

a few years ago an archeological team used metal detectors to locate artifacts at the battle site. they discovered dozens of bullets from the cavalry men's sidearms buried in the ground about ten inches down, all pointing down.

after a little thought, they realized that each bullet marked the spot where a sioux had located a wounded trooper, stood over him, and killed him with his own gun, or another that he had picked up. the bodies were all taken away and buried, but each bullet became a permanent grave marker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What is interesting about Pulpculture's follow up on the flotilla "massacre" in international waters, is that Israel rejected an investigtion be permitted by international observers, and "declared" it would conduct its own investigation of the killings. My own,assumption, at this point in time, is that there were to many "neutral" witnesses from some forty Arab countries whose testimony cannot be swept under the carpet, and that families of those killed demanded the autopsies be done. We have not seen "live footage" that was filmed or shot during the event broadcast here in the United States. Is there footage of the tragedy that is being shown in other countries that is not shown here ? In this modern age of digital imaging, I find it impossible that those on board did not record images at the time of the event; unless Isreal "seized" all digital recording devices for "thier investigation". My sense is that we will never see any images of this tragedy, if they exist, which only reinforces what many perceive is government control and access to historical documents in real time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kiahanie



Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 464
Location: Oregon

PostPosted: Wed Jun 30, 2010 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Israeli government did indeed seize all recording devices. I saw some IDF footage -undoubtedly carefully edited- in Turkey, and my son says he saw some on the Internet over here, also undoubtedly carefully edited. While undoubtedly authentic, those videos failed to record what many eyewitnesses were reported as seeing.
_________________
"There is a field out beyond right and wrong. I'll meet you there." --Jellaludin Rumi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Fri Jul 2, 2010 4:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Media manipulation by pro-Israeli groups is monitored by various groups, some of whom post their information on Israel Lobbby Watch, with another group posting addtitional information on The Electronic Infitada site. There should be no doubt in anyone's minds that media access, control and pro- Israel commentary have always been a major component of Isreali foriegn policy, with citizens of foreign countries living outside Israel who support the Zionist agenda being willing contributors to Israeli media efforts. I just learned this week about a group calling itself "Campus Watch", which consists of volunteer students at various colleges and univerities here in the United Stated dedicated to monitoring political postions taken by their professors, who then start an information campaign targeting the professors lectures and writings as being anti- Israel, and in some cases, anit-Semetic. While the actual killing of Palestinains occures mostly in Gaza and the West Bank, stiffling of the intellectual freedom that questions Isreali policies starts right here at home, in our own universities.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Pulpculture



Joined: 28 Apr 2003
Posts: 564
Location: England

PostPosted: Tue Nov 1, 2011 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is very interesting......

Dispatches - inside Britain's Israel Lobby

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E70BwA7xgU
_________________
.


I said don't forget Burma!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Tue Nov 1, 2011 3:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The "special relationship" which Israeli lobbyist enjoy privately with high ranking government officals in both Britian and the United States is often hidden in plain view. It jus so happens the Los Angeles Times ran a Op-Ed article yesterday, October 31, 2011, titled " A true ally in the Middle East", which was authored by Robert Balckwell, former deputy national security advisor for strategic planning under George Bush, and Walter Slocomb, former undersecretary for defense under Bill Clinton, both of who are associated with the "Washington Insitute for Near East Policy", which recently published a "report" titled " Israel: A Strategic Asset for the United States". Here in the Unites States, as is being made clear by the U-Tube pod cast coming out of Britain, the Israeli lobby in both countires has a stangle hold on forgein policy descisions, which while being favorable to Israeli, are not evenhanded or even remotely devised with equal consideration towards Arabs. Here, those whose oppose such blantant influence peddeling and forgien policy doctrines are frequently called anti-Semitic for even questioning any policy which has remote implicatons for the alleged "safety and security" of Israel. Supporitng the Zionist cause for a Jewish Homeland because of the Holocaust always seemed to be like "robbing Peter to pay Paul", to use a Catholic phrase, with the and blood spill of militant Zionism now unable to be cleansed and washed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
woundwort



Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 18
Location: Behind You

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I found the Dispatches programme interesting, but maybe not for the reasons Pulpculture did. Looking back in this thread, I see he linked neutrally to David Duke.

I live in the Yu-Kay, and I have heard of Duke. Even if I hadn't, if I found myself not recoiling from comments made by him, I would ask myself if I had gone down the wrong path. I would wonder if I were too different from an American who hadn't heard of Nick Griffin linking to a speech of his.

Now, has anyone else noticed the anti-Israel agit prop which never is off our streets, or free oppobrium in the mainstream media? Yes? Okay, let's drop the canard that there's any campaign to silence it.

In face of this - such as riots outside the Israeli Embassy including serious criminal assaults on attending police, compared to the almost complete public protest against the crack-down in Syria - the idea that there is a campaign against criticism strikes as either the speaker's desire to be seen as bravely speaking truth to power or a quasi-religious belief.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anit-Israeli agi-prop ? I think that if the state of Israel was judged by the international community using the same standards it judges other nations violations of human rights, negative commentary about Israeli manipulation of the media on both sided of the pond would be silenced altogether. Zionism, since its inception, has alwasy had as its agenda the displacement of the native Arab population to fullfill its mission. I've always imagined that only by addressing the issues raised by Zionist ideology itself can one fully begin to grasp the horror bestowed upon the Palestinian Arab in its name.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
woundwort



Joined: 18 Sep 2011
Posts: 18
Location: Behind You

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 4:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Anit-Israeli agi-prop ?


Yes. Stuff like street theatre props equating disobedient Jews to Nazis, with the implication that they're as bad as their [most recent] oppressors.

Jamaica has an atrocious record of treatment towards her sexual minorities, and I would welcome anyone publicizing this. If someone turned-up at a protest outside the Jamaican High Commission wearing an a white hood and brandishing a noose, I think you'd suspect that there's some cultural baggage.

Similar would go for a protest outside the Zimbabwean Embassy which attracted people dressed as a British Colonial officer and invoking memories of the Matabele Wars as if to say "look, these are people who knew how to deal with your lot".

Likewise for anyone who linked neutrally to a reptilian-like former Democrat representative from Louisiana and graduate of the Ukrainian University of Tractors at Babi Yar or whatever it was. A difficulty is recognizing Duke for what he is, as it happens, happens a lot amongst self-styled anti-Zionists in the Yu-Kay... it's weird.

Modern conflicts - especially those in urban situations - result disproportionately in the deaths of children, but it's in the anti-Israel agit prop that attention to this reaches its dizziest heights with sexual levels of hatred. There's a significant constituency within the practitioners of this who seem susceptable to viewing Israelis as baby-killers, controlling the world's media/finances, using accusations of antisemitism in bad faith, believing they're a Chosen Race (as if the deity of the Hebrew Bible was speaking Jacobean English in Amos 3:2) and lacking all empathy towards others because that's what they believe Jews are like.

The aforementioned Dispatches programme showed supposed members of this Israel Lobby through shaky camera work as they darted from cars to locked buildings with menacing music in the background (none of them make any effort to hide their identities in real life). The interviewees getting the sympathetic treatment, on the other hand, were shown in comfortable and well-lit offices lined with books.

Thus, the first group were hiding in the shadows (a Biblical term as it happens), and the latter group were learnčd and open to debate. Watching it I had an uncomfortable feeling I was watching an antisemitic production.

Others might not consider their positions to have an antisemitic basis (and generally have a very tightly argued self-exculpation to this effect); yet they so often tend towards imagery to the contrary. Such as Pulpculture referring to British Jews' control of the media. Not the Israel Lobby, or even the loaded term Zionist Jews, but Jews in toto.

Or your describing Zionism as being irrevocably tainted with blood. This presumably is more so than any number of other regional conflicts over the latter half of the 20th Century, including those which have claimed many more lives than the Arab/Israeli one. I would argue that anyone with an awareness of historiography of antisemism in Europe would be wary of accuing the largest group of Jews of having some sort of blood guilt.

Then there's use of the term Jewry. It might just be me, but I find this as ugly as Negro.

Quote:
I think that if the state of Israel was judged by the international community using the same standards it judges other nations violations of human rights,


Like the past 12 months of state-endorsed mayhem in Syria? Tell me, where are the protests in Western cities against actions which have killed many more Arabs than have died at Israeli hands over the past three decades?

Quote:
negative commentary about Israeli manipulation of the media on both sided of the pond would be silenced altogether.


What does this mean?

Quote:
Zionism, since its inception, has alwasy had as its agenda the displacement of the native Arab population to fullfill its mission.


That's a falsehood based around statements attributed to the likes of Ben Gurion such as "We must expel Arabs and take their places". What he said was "We do not wish, we do not need to expel the Arabs and take their place. All our aspirations are built upon the assumption — proven throughout all our activity in the Land — that there is enough room in the country for ourselves and the Arabs".

There are many more like that, and I cannot describe their creation as anything other than a medacious fabrication and direct modern equivalent of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

I don't wish to get embroiled in a discussion about specific pieces of Israeli policy or history. Merely to ask why, of all conflicts on the go, this one attracts such attention from uninvolved foreigners in which one side is judged by the harshest possible standards in ways not seen, say, with the USA tribe's expansion into others' territories during the 19th Century.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CelticNorth



Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Posts: 755
Location: East of Eden

PostPosted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're reading my mind, Friend woundwort, regarding the systematic ethnic cleansing and displacement of the American Indian by the United States in the 19th century. If there ever was a historical lesson deliberately unlearned, it is that of the injustice done to the American Indian. I spent last summer touring the Apache Indian "Reservation" in Arizona, and visiting the Indian school at "Fort Apache". It was enough to make me be ashamed to be called an American. I imagine the underlying reason the Arab- Israeli conflict has dominated the popular western press over other struggles is becasuse of its biblical overtones, with the claims of a Abrahmic religious right to a land already being occupied. Like the term "Manifest Destiny" used as short hand to justify Amreican expansionism in the 19th century and the subsequent treatment of the Amecian Indian, "Zionism" has overtones of similar underlying meanings in relation to its percetion of the Palestinain Arab. I just do not believe that ealy Zionist's entered Palestine with the intent to grow corn together and share in building a respectful, recipocal and democratic community of equals- the statements of David Ben Gurion not withstanding.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    QuakerInfo.com Forum Forum Index -> Quaker Discussion All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Page 7 of 8

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group