 |
QuakerInfo.com Forum A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Israeli cabinet met for a week to discuss the incoming aid convoy and their arrogant conclusion was to attack the boats in INTERNATIONAL waters using Israeli armed commandos. To then hijack the ships and take them to Israel amounting to Piracy. Breaking the international laws in place by normal decent countries. Again Israel has broken them. The Israeli media then has the audacity to spout the usual tripe about how the people on the boats are supporters of Hamas, Al Quada and other terrorist groups. Then they say the people on the boats were armed showing images of catapults on the floors - It would be a joke if people weren't lying dead.
The UN will do nothing as ever. At best we'll get an Israeli investigation into itself. Guess what? - it'll be full of lies and go nowhere. Be sure though that people in Gaza will continue to die. _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 5:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthony wrote: |
...Could the boats have been carrying weapons to Gaza? Was the aid transport sanctioned by an international body? Were the boats issued with a warning and instructed to cease progress and turn around? Have weapons been smuggled into Gaza before, by sea?.... |
Hi Anthony
All this is totally irrelevant. You can't board ships in international waters on any whim or assumption. Israel is complaining that their soldiers were met with hostility. Rightly so if they are illegally boarding boats as military personnel carrying GUNS. If the Israeli's feel there were guns or weapons on board then they should intercept the boats in their own waters and act within their own laws.
If the people of Gaza want guns they can bring them in through the tunnels. Why would they load the boats that have medicines on with guns and ruin their argument? These boats were a statement to the world - the people behind them are not stupid they are passionate people (like all the other passionate people before that were against slavery and apartheid.)
I wouldn't be surprised if Israel will now place some guns on the Aid ships, whilst in their port, to fabricate the Israeli side of the argument. _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma!
Last edited by Pulpculture on Tue Jun 1, 2010 6:31 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 5:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pulpculture wrote: |
[
If the people of Gaza want guns they can bring them in through the tunnels. |
Totally irrelevant?
If the tunnels are still functioning then are they big enough to smuggle large weapons or artillery? My point is that Israel must have felt it was being threatened by these boats. My question is why did it feel so threatened that it would commit such an attack under such conditions. I am being a Devil's Advocate to at least try and understand from Israel's perspective why it risked international condemnation? Was it because if feels confident in the support of America. One will not get for by simply reacting, one must at least try to understand. The fact that I ask such questions does not mean I condone the action. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think the Israeli's figured on a massive over the top deployment of force to hinder anyone from thinking about doing this ever again. _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
A History........
Contrary to a popular misconception, the conflict in Palestine/Israel is neither hundreds of years old nor is it primarily religious. At the heart of it, is a struggle for the control of land.
Zionism, which emerged in nineteenth century Europe, is an ideology of Jewish nationalism. A key factor in the birth of the Zionist movement was anti-semitic persecution in Europe and Russia.
But in choosing Palestine as the place for a Jewish state, the Zionists were on a collision course with Palestine’s Arab population (Muslim and Christian).
In 1900, the population of Palestine was about 96% Arab, and 4% Jewish. In 1917, British Foreign Secretary Lord Balfour revealed that the British government supported “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people”. The Palestinian Arabs – at that stage still over 90% of the population – were simply referred to as the “non-Jewish communities”.
Jewish immigration into Palestine increased dramatically through the 1930s and ‘40s, as a result of the intensifying persecution in Europe that culminated in the Nazi Holocaust.
When the UN voted for Palestine to be partitioned in 1947, over half of the land was allotted to the Jewish state, even though Palestinians were over two thirds of the population and only 6% of Palestine was under Jewish ownership.
In 1948, as the State of Israel was established, up to 90% of the Palestinians who would have been inside the new Jewish state’s borders were expelled. As many as 500 Palestinian towns and villages were destroyed. This is why Palestinians refer to the creation of Israel as the Nakba (‘catastrophe’ in Arabic).
In 1967, during a war with the neighbouring Arab states, Israel conquered the West Bank and Gaza Strip, beginning its military rule of what became known as the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT).
Soon after the occupation began, Israel began to expropriate land and create Jewish settlements. These settlements have been established and expanded, by successive Israeli governments, in breach of international law.
In 1987, Palestinians under Israeli military occupation rose up in what became known as the First Intifada (literally, ‘shaking off’ in Arabic). Stone-throwing Palestinians confronted Israeli soldiers, while many communities adopted classic civil disobedience tactics.
In 1993, the Oslo Peace Accords were signed, establishing the Palestinian Authority in small pockets of the OPT. The claim was that this would be an interim stage towards full Palestinian statehood, but by 2000 the Israeli settler population in the West Bank had grown by 50% (three times the population increase in Israel itself).
In the summer of 2000, attempts by Bill Clinton to get Israeli PM Ehud Barak and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat to reach a deal at Camp David failed.
At the end of September 2000, another Palestinian uprising began (the Second Intifada). It was triggered by the visit of Ariel Sharon and hundreds of security forces to the site of the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, one of the holiest places for Muslims.
In the first 30 days of the Second Intifada, over 120 Palestinians were killed by Israel across the West Bank and Gaza, without one Palestinian attack inside Israel. The violence quickly escalated.
Israeli forces inside the OPT invaded Palestinian towns and refugee camps, deploying tanks, helicopters and F-16s. Palestinian suicide bombers targeted buses and restaurants in Israeli cities. By the end of 2006, 4400 Palestinians had been killed, and around 1000 Israelis.
In 2002, Israel began work on the Separation Wall in the OPT, officially calling it a security measure. However, the Wall’s route, looping around the West Bank and East Jerusalem to include significant Jewish settlements, suggested a land grab. The judges of the International Court of Justice agreed 14-1 in July 2004 that the Wall is contrary to international law.
Israel pulled out several thousand settlers from the Gaza Strip in 2005, part of a unilateral ‘disengagement’ plan. Then-PM Ariel Sharon said that the move was necessary to strengthen Israeli settlements in the West Bank and would mean Israel was no longer responsible for the 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza.
After Palestinian elections in January 2006, when Hamas won a parliamentary majority over its rival Fatah, the Gaza Strip was subjected to an increasingly tight blockade. In December 2008, after a truce between Hamas and Israel expired, Israel launched a massive assault on the Gaza Strip. The ostensible provocation was Palestinian rocket fire, which had killed over 20 Israelis since 2001.
Israel’s offensive wreaked massive destruction to every day infrastructure, and 1,400 Palestinians – the vast majority civilians – were killed in a few weeks. A UN fact finding team (the ‘Goldstone report’) would later conclude that Israel and Hamas were guilty of war crimes _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CelticNorth
Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 755 Location: East of Eden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The actions of the Israeli military seem always excessive, and appear to never calculate in thier response the saving of human life. Israeli intelligence had to have known the content of materials destined to Gaza, as well as a general profile of the people, from some forty nations, who would be on those ships. The United Nations Security Council will meet, and will no doubt encounter, once again, a veto by the United States for any meaningful action against Israel. When did Israel lay claim to the shores off Gaza as Israeli waters anyway? While the government of Israel rants and raves about groups such as Hamas and Hezbolla being "terrorists" organizations, they remain unshakable about the 300,000 illegal Jewish "settlers" on the West Bank, which only fuels the conflict. Israel seems to not want peace, but more land. As for the Palestinians, they are justified in wanting guns, ammunition and any military ordinace they can command to defend themselves. Like lambs at a slaughter, we have disarmed them to the point where the wolf at the door can enter at will, and at any time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 4:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It seems that Israel was set-up and in its arrogance fell for the bait.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CelticNorth
Joined: 22 Sep 2005 Posts: 755 Location: East of Eden
|
Posted: Tue Jun 1, 2010 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Free Gaza Movement, which is behind the peace flotilla, is no stanger to Israeli authorities. What is so amazing about the intransience of the Israeli government is the fact that the Free Gaza Movement is in no way, shape or form a voice for Hamas or any other "terrorist" group in the Middle East. Click onto the Fee Gaza Movement website to get accurate information about the group; something the major news media in the United States has failed to do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrocles
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Anthony,
I think that most members of the flotilla would admit that their action was "provocative" in the sense that they wanted to provoke a heavy reaction of the Irael government. (They would defend that referring to the "freedom rides" and similar actions the Civil Rights Movement did in the U.S. southern states and which were provocative as well.
But (from all I've read) I don't see that anyone was really prepared for a nightly attack by Israeli soldiers from helicopters. Insofar the claim (of the Israel government) that the soldiers were lured into a trap and then attacked seems unfounded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Trouble is passions run high when the people at the receiving end are caged up like animals and dying.
The Israeli government are very clever with the media in twisting everything that comes their way into "being involved with Hamas" or a "terrorist organisation" (and the Jewish run UK media follow this this line in support) - Oh look we're back to the original thread - Israel and it's control of the UK media. Nice one. _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Patrocles wrote: |
I think that most members of the flotilla would admit that their action was "provocative" in the sense that they wanted to provoke a heavy reaction of the Irael government. (They would defend that referring to the "freedom rides" and similar actions the Civil Rights Movement did in the U.S. southern states and which were provocative as well. |
Is it right to be provocative under such circumstances? Gandhi successfully used non-violent confrontation to highlight injustice but I don't believe this incident had non-violent intent.
| Patrocles wrote: |
But (from all I've read) I don't see that anyone was really prepared for a nightly attack by Israeli soldiers from helicopters. Insofar the claim (of the Israel government) that the soldiers were lured into a trap and then attacked seems unfounded. |
I see this a little differently because from the footage the Israeli soldiers were quite severely beaten with metal bars, at times in at least a three on one attack. Guns seem to have been prohibited but other weaponry was not only available but enthusiastically used to injure and perhaps kill the soldiers. This puts it in a different category than the Civil Rights movement and Gandhi.
It seems that the Israelis fell into a trap that was not completely a peaceful initiative but something quite the opposite. If it had peaceful intent there would have been no violent opposition even if the soldiers had themselves inflicted violence. I think both sides let themselves down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Point taken Anthony however we have to remember there were numerous ships and the rest of the ships didn't attack the invading Israeli soldiers. We mustn't get distracted from the facts - this was a group of ships taking food, medicine, wheelchairs, building materials and the like to a large colony of people caged into an area with all routes in and out restricted. The Israeli soldiers illegally invaded these ships and A HANDFUL of flotilla men on one ship attacked some soldiers.
If a people who so recently experienced such unspeakable inhumanities cannot understand the injustice and suffering its territorial ambitions are inflicting - what hope is there?
This is the sort of people the IDF are made up of:
"An Italian journalist who was detained by the Israel Defense Forces following the raid on the Gaza-bound flotilla says his credit card was used to purchase items after it was confiscated by the Israeli authorities."
Source _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Anthony
Joined: 30 Jun 2004 Posts: 1542
|
Posted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Pulpculture wrote: |
Point taken Anthony however we have to remember there were numerous ships and the rest of the ships didn't attack the invading Israeli soldiers. We mustn't get distracted from the facts - this was a group of ships taking food, medicine, wheelchairs, building materials and the like to a large colony of people caged into an area with all routes in and out restricted. The Israeli soldiers illegally invaded these ships and A HANDFUL of flotilla men on one ship attacked some soldiers.
If a people who so recently experienced such unspeakable inhumanities cannot understand the injustice and suffering its territorial ambitions are inflicting - what hope is there?
This is the sort of people the IDF are made up of:
"An Italian journalist who was detained by the Israel Defense Forces following the raid on the Gaza-bound flotilla says his credit card was used to purchase items after it was confiscated by the Israeli authorities."
Source |
Hi Pop'
I am not saying that the idea or purpose of the flotilla was wrong but it was not a peace mission insofar as they were prepared to do violence to the Israelis should they board the ships. They anticipated being boarded by troops and were prepared to attack with iron bars and do serious injury. This is not the same principle of the Civil Rights Movement or Gandhi who used non-reactive, non-violent, peaceful confrontation in the face of violent opposition. The Israelis fell for the bait and both sides came out worse with casualties and adverse publicity. I feel very strongly about the free Gaza campaign but the Israelis are fearful and fear generates violence. Do they have a right to be fearful? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Pulpculture wrote: |
| (and the Jewish run UK media |
Citation, please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pulpculture

Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Posts: 564 Location: England
|
Posted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anthony wrote: |
Hi Pop'
I am not saying that the idea or purpose of the flotilla was wrong but it was not a peace mission insofar as they were prepared to do violence to the Israelis should they board the ships. They anticipated being boarded by troops and were prepared to attack with iron bars and do serious injury. This is not the same principle of the Civil Rights Movement or Gandhi who used non-reactive, non-violent, peaceful confrontation in the face of violent opposition. The Israelis fell for the bait and both sides came out worse with casualties and adverse publicity. I feel very strongly about the free Gaza campaign but the Israelis are fearful and fear generates violence. Do they have a right to be fearful? |
Hi. We obviously both see the same situation differently. That's life I guess. I see it that a handful of trouble makers one of 6 or 7 ships caused a problem. The majority accepted the illegal boarding and went with the flow. I'm not letting the dozen idiots out of the hundreds of participants ruin the event.
Citation to follow the men have just finished putting my shed up  _________________ .
I said don't forget Burma! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|