 |
QuakerInfo.com Forum A place to discuss Quakers and Quakerism
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Traveller
Joined: 23 Apr 2008 Posts: 6
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shay

Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Posts: 885
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know... where does "That of God in all" stop?
(I can't actually pause here, but imagine a pause to consider the idea)
I have my personal answer but others may have their own.
In the linguistic and/or reporting area...I think Pagans is a bit of a misnomer- it's a handy term for those who think of themselves as such but it's not really accurate from the dictionary, where most people who don't think that way get ideas from- the word pagan 'means' "a person holding religious beliefs other than those of the main world religions." But from another standpoint, it could mean one who believes there is a spark of God in every living thing... which isn't an unFriendly idea. (As someone who rides a motorcycle in America I'm well aware the term "Pagan" can mean waaay more that one thing too!) You know, even the SOF has ideas that are different from world religions when i comes to practice... where, exactly, is the line?
I'm pretty sure there are Friends who still light candles at mass for family members or Friends who believe fervently in their water baptism... but do these practices mean it's a growing threat to Friends' beliefs?
Quite frankly, that website does not seem very Friendly. I searched for Quakers and it seemed most articles thought of us as a quaint idea that has outlived it's usefulness or we're some weird throwback. I think the idea that I got most of all from reading a couple of the essays was, "Don't question this now, silly, we've got it covered." I don't mind being evangelized, but when I feel downright patronized it's another matter.
Others may disagree, as I'm sure they will. I guess my main idea is that the Society will, as it has, endure as long as it is keeps to it's ideals. The methods may be up for debate, but the belief that there is something better, some road higher, some part of us closer to the divine, and some way we can make the world better... call me a dork, but I believe that's a good goal to take to heart every day.
I know... dork.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailsa

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 181 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I was a Pagan for many years before coming to Quakerism.
I thought this poem I wrote might explain in some measure how I came to that decision and why. I will be more than happy to discuss but for me, obviously there were links but Quakerism finally felt more "my home".
The Party
The printed invitation that fluttered on the mat
Said “You’re coming to a party, no arguments, that’s that.
It’s held for every pagan, it’s come just as you are
Being held just ‘round the corner, you will not need the car.”
Amazed and quite delighted I turned the invite round
To see who could have sent me this thing that I had found
The signature below it was bold, embossed and bright
It didn’t give a name, just – yours sincerely, Light.
How very, very thoughtful to think of asking me
Who’s loosely-speaking pagan, though highly label-free.
Whoever this bod “Light” was, a generous kind of soul
If getting all together was this party’s only goal.
Well the party was a belter and everyone was there
The heathens and the druids, the eclectics, Wiccans (dancing bare)
Kitchen witches swapping, their favourite recipes
With Egyptian-centred ladies who gave them kohl for free.
There was mead and wine and Celts who were arguing the toss
With Greek and Roman worshippers,( I didn’t hear who lost.)
I found a great big pot of tea, which is what I wanted most
Apart from my big intrigue … who was our charming host?
So I sat down in a corner with my mug of tea and bun
Inviting who’d invited us to come and share the fun
To come and sit beside me and tell me their true name
Cos while I like a party, I’m not good at guessing games.
And a voice from right beside me said “Please just call me Light.
Not Apollo, Lugh or Jesus, Mohammed, Buddha, right?
I’m Astarte, Isis, Cernunos, and all the gods you know
And others you ain’t heard of … you’ll learn this as you grow.
Whatever people call me, I am the light to all
Who love all of creation, the greatest, the most small.
If you can see my handiwork in fur and feathered friend
In other folks and trees and stones – you’ll see me in the end.
So call me Light, small otter and seek no other name
For I’m no-name and I’m all-names and I love you just the same”. _________________ Still walking cheerfully ......
http://bipolarbear-buckshot.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
punkrainbow
Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 301 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
So call me Light, small otter and seek no other name
For I’m no-name and I’m all-names and I love you just the same”. |
Thank you Ailsa, that poem really spoke to me, especially the last few lines. Well now you mention it, I was very inspired by Modern Druidry for many years. Having spent my childhood going to High Anglican services, it was a relief in many ways to participate in a simple spirituality rooted in the natural world. Looking back now, I wonder whether that very earthy spirituality of trees and fields, gave me a taste for silence and simplicity, which led me to Quakerism? No matter, like Ailsa, I've found my way home.
| Quote: |
| I'm pretty sure there are Friends who still light candles at mass for family members or Friends who believe fervently in their water baptism... but do these practices mean it's a growing threat to Friends' beliefs? |
I think your anxieties about loosing our distinctive identity are thoughtful and measured Shay. The difficulty is, where does inclusion start and 'free for all' begin? If we passively accept whatever practices that flow into our meetings from the outside, what will happen to our historic commitments to 'inward sacraments', playful silence, simplicity and even the peace testimony? What is the point of reversing downturn by being radically inclusive, if Quakerism looses it's essence to the whims of other movements? I would feel the same level of unease if a Catholic Mass was held in a Quaker meeting.
I don't sound very much like a Liberal Quaker here, do I? I suspect Keith will be rubbing his hands, recognising in my remarks, his own disquiet about my already quite inclusive branch. While we should never close our ears to possible spiritual diversity in our meetings, (from pagans or anyone else), I feel we need to uphold Quaker traditions and methods of spiritual discernment. This is a delicate balance to meet for sure. But in fairness it is the balance that Quakers have always sort to strike between individual inspiration and corporate discernment. After all, remember the James Nayler incident? Nayler entered Bristol on horseback in imitation of Christ's entry into Jerusalem, his followers crying out "Holy! Holy! Holy!" and strewing garments in his path.
The event was decried by the authorities as a terrible blasphemy and by many Friends as a 'fall'. Nayler's actions provide us with a lesson in seeking to balance personal revelation and the cohesion of the community. The meeting is designed to check the passions and imagination of the individual by holding the motivations and beliefs of the individual to group scrutiny. Without that scrutiny Quakerism could not of survived past the first generation. It would merely have been absorbed by other traditions or churches. This is not say that Quakerism has never encountered influences from the outside. In the 19th century Evangelical Christianity exerted a major influence on the direction of Friends, but it did not infringe on the basic insiights of early Quakers. _________________ I saw the infinite love of God. I saw also that there was an ocean of darkness and death; but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Gracie
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 170 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Chalk me up as another who came to Christian Quakerism via a pleasant stay in Neo-Paganism. Ailsa, love the poem. _________________ http://sowingmildoats.wordpress.com
When will our consciences grow so tender that we will act to prevent human misery rather than avenge it?
Eleanore Roosevelt |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailsa

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 181 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you so much dear Friends for liking the poem.
I think, like Punkrainbow my flight to Paganism was a revolt against very strict Christianity which, as a small child had be quaking in my sensible shoes. Far from believing in a loving God, I lived in fear of being struck down because I was so wicked (I wasn't actually I was too darn scared even to be naughty)
To the point where God (capital G, masculine) became a bad word in my dictionary. So I ran towards a more female and nature centred worship. I stayed with Paganism for a very long time, becoming an HPS and teaching others.
But the revelation hit me as I described in the poem and, having attended Quaker Meeting with my Aunt and talked endlessly with her, I came home. Thanks Be!
But I agree that we are walking a tightrope. What are the fundamental beliefs or principles on which we cannot give way in the name of being inclusive or non-exclusive? At what point would we say, no that is not acceptable?
I don't unfortunately have a Meeting with whom to discuss this so I would be interested in other's opinions. _________________ Still walking cheerfully ......
http://bipolarbear-buckshot.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
james

Joined: 11 Jun 2004 Posts: 1108 Location: Minneapolis
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ailsa wrote: |
| But I agree that we are walking a tightrope. What are the fundamental beliefs or principles on which we cannot give way in the name of being inclusive or non-exclusive? At what point would we say, no that is not acceptable? |
I personally have never seen a community that I would consider "too inclusive." I have a hard time even imagining what that could mean. I have seen many that I consider too exclusive.
But let me point out that I'm talking about accepting any person as they are, which is not the same as accepting any behavior. To speak of extreme cases, a person who came through our doors and started berating or beating people up clearly needs to be told, stop what you're doing or leave. On a less extreme and potentially more ambivalent level, a person who came to worship and week after week preached hellfire and damnation to gays, might also be asked to stop doing that or stop coming.
But beliefs? Principles? I can't imagine one which I could endorse as the basis for denying the solace of our community to a person. _________________ James Riemermann
www.nontheistfriends.org
www.liberalquakers.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
orPowers
Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 637 Location: Medford, OR
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd have to say that Gamaliel's advice concerning the new ideas of the followers of Jesus has some bearing: "38Therefore, in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail.39But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God.” Part of the point is that we should be able to discern the Light as it is expressed without putting artificial restrictions on how it is expressed, though practical restrictions on the order of James' observations are in order. The other part of the point for me is that, if the thoughts and ministry of Jesus is as cogent and meaningful today as I believe it to be, the expression of THAT Light will be seen that way too. There are a number of people who have come to Quaker thought and processes from, and continuing to express other traditions that have grown to appreciate that last point.
In His Love,
orPowers _________________ Romans 8:38-39
my blog: http://mild-side.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
punkrainbow
Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 301 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I think, like Punkrainbow my flight to Paganism was a revolt against very strict Christianity which, as a small child had be quaking in my sensible shoes. |
So much of what you say Ailsa, mirrors my own experience.
When I was a young teenager, the Biblical passage that really frightened me was Matthew 7:13-14, which contained the rather chilling image of the 'narrow gate', which implied to me that my chances weren't good for avoiding hell, (especially since I wasn't sure about Jesus' divinity). One day I just snapped. I thought, if God is the sort of being who condones eternal torment for (a) disbelief or (b) moral lapses, then he is not good and therefore not worthy of anyone's worship.
I turned to Modern Druidry after reading Marion Zimmer Bradley's 'Mists of Avalon', which introduced me to a joyous, life-affirming religion, which reveres the feminine, sexuality and the cycles of nature. One of the most moving passages in the book for me is when Morgaine (the central character) enters a Christian chapel and instead of being repulsed, she finds that as a priestess of the Goddess she can feel her power, even there. Here is a small extract from the passage:
"Morgaine looked on the statue of Brigid and she could feel the power come from it in great waves that permeated the chapel. She bowed her head. But Brigit is not a Christian saint, she thought, even if Patricius thinks so. That is the Goddess as she was worshipped in Ireland. And I know it, even if they think otherwise, these women know the power of the Immortal. Exile her as they may, she will prevail. The Goddess will never withdraw hersef from mankind. And Morgaine bowed her head and whispered the first sincere prayer she had ever spoken in any Christian church".
I came back to the person of Jesus when I realised that this man was not an unflinching, masculine presence, but was full of universal love. This was the same Jesus, who looked upon the city that rejected him and wailed "Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing" (Luke 13:31-35) Here God appears as Mother, cherishing her children and this is the same Spirit I feel often in Meeting. While some may find such language pagan, but this is how my heart responds to God, so I feel I must be faithful to it. _________________ I saw the infinite love of God. I saw also that there was an ocean of darkness and death; but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
punkrainbow
Joined: 24 Dec 2007 Posts: 301 Location: Leeds
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I'd have to say that Gamaliel's advice concerning the new ideas of the followers of Jesus has some bearing |
Thank you orPowers for reminding me of that wise advice. Perhaps my anxiety about Quaker identity shows undue hypris. Doubtless, God will do his will, and will use whoever he wishes to achieve it. You're right. We should wait on the Light and everything will become clear. Thank you for reminding for me that. _________________ I saw the infinite love of God. I saw also that there was an ocean of darkness and death; but an infinite ocean of light and love, which flowed over the ocean of darkness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailsa

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 181 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Punkrainbow - I too loved Mists of Avalon and have given copies of it to dozens of friends. I am sure that book has been more responsible than any other for bringing disillusioned people to paganism.
And yes, that final passage where Morgaine as a High Priestess comes to accept that the Infinite is the Infinite no matter what form it is disguised in, mirrors exactly what I came to realise myself.
And I agree that we must keep our hearts and minds open to avoid excluding anything of the Light that may be sent to us in no matter what form.
If we continue to "answer that of God in every one" then we can hardly go far wrong because we will know the Truth in what people say from what is Not Truth. We have come to Quakerism because Spirit has spoken to us in our hearts - if we listen to our hearts, Spirit will tell us what to keep and what to discard. No? _________________ Still walking cheerfully ......
http://bipolarbear-buckshot.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Maddison
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 238 Location: North England
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I know that there are Pagan/Quakers in Britain Yearly Meeting. I recently asked an elder in the BYM, if Satanist Quakers would be acceptable. He said no because they are evil, but who is he to say they are evil after all they do worship the Angel of the Light.
I personally think it is a nonsense to have Pagan Quakers, but why not everyone else is welcome to the Quaker Party.
I once fell madly in love with a Witch and impressed her with my knowledge of Paganism, as I studied it when I was young. Meeting her rekindled my interest in it and I even went to the first Pagan/Christian conference in Britain, as far as know it may have been the first in the world. I met a lot of interesting people there, some were very intelligent and could explain their beliefs in a logical manner others were completely nuts. I met one of the many King Arthurs who live in Britain and the King of Fairies was also there. I personally have no problem with Pagans or people of any other religion within their own religious group, but I can not understand why people seem so unhappy with their own religion they felt drawn to Quakerism. I have give up trying to understand why some Quakers are willing to accept them. _________________ Don't follow leaders and watch the parking meters, the pumps don't work because the vandals took the handles.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailsa

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 181 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Keith Maddison wrote: |
I met a lot of interesting people there, some were very intelligent and could explain their beliefs in a logical manner others were completely nuts. I met one of the many King Arthurs who live in Britain and the King of Fairies was also there. |
Yes, there is that. Paganism does seem to attract more than its fair share of somewhat "disturbed" individuals, shall we say? I lost count of the number of Fairy Princesses and Legolas lookalikes I met at the one Pag Fed conference I went to.
As to there being Pagan Quakers - I would probably and surprisingly agree with you Keith. Having gone through the process myself, I found it difficult to keep a foot in both camps and eventually made the decision. Many people pass through different stages in their spiritual path before "coming home" to whatever faith.
For me, Paganism was a long and very important step in my spiritual journey - one which now continues on the Quaker path. And I don't see it as breaking my previous vows, just in expanding my understanding of Spirit rather than sticking to a narrow definition of Goddess and Consort or one of several pantheons (but then we go onto pick n mix or Ecclectic paganism which is a subject on which I could bore you for hours ) _________________ Still walking cheerfully ......
http://bipolarbear-buckshot.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Keith Maddison
Joined: 20 Feb 2007 Posts: 238 Location: North England
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Christian/Pagan conference I went to was organized by the Pag Fed, it was in 1994 I think. I think a lot of people have a look at Paganism, I still have a shelve full of Pagan books from years ago, most of them are rubbish and I a lot of their ancient traditions go all the way back to the 1960s, some are still being made up today. _________________ Don't follow leaders and watch the parking meters, the pumps don't work because the vandals took the handles.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ailsa

Joined: 10 Apr 2008 Posts: 181 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think one of the problems, Keith, is that most of the young people drawn to Paganism now (it is so coooool) forget that it was invented in the 1950s by Gerald Gardener. Many actually believe that they are continuing a tradition dating back thousands of years. It is very difficult to convince them otherwise.
And yes, now that there are so many breakaway groups from the original Wicca, it has become very much "make it up as you go along" and change what doesn't suit. (this is what is known as Ecclectic)
Those of us who studied hard and meditated and worked on it got quite fed up with the "all show and no substance" people who liked to call themselves Pagans and cover themselves in jangly things. _________________ Still walking cheerfully ......
http://bipolarbear-buckshot.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|